Hi all,
I’m asking about what to do with ConfigurableLowThrustManeuver ? It doesn’t implement the field version of acceleration so one cannot do STM or OD with it. It either needs a serious rework or must be ditched all together with ThrustAndAttittudeProvider I would say. Thoughts?
Cheers,
Romain.
Hello @Serrof,
Did not have much time to think about it but i always thought that the ThrustDirectionAndAttittudeProvider was weird.
In addition, one could use the Maneuver class which is more generic to perform the same job ?
Cheers,
Vincent
Thanks Vincent for your message.
Yes I would say that it should be covered by Maneuver.
However it’d be good to have users tell us how they use it to double check.
Otherwise I’m very tempted to just get rid of it.
Cheers,
Romain.
Hello @Serrof,
Sorry for the late reply. Maybe we should ask the authors first.
@andfio and @Mikael, what do you think? Can we do the same thing with Maneuver?
Maxime
Oh, I can tell you that this class is not used anymore here 