Kalman Filter and Unscented Kalman Filter Comparison

Hi @Echulion

Your 2 questions address 2 difficult subjects of the orbit determination for which there is no perfect answers with perfect values since they depend on the measurement provider and the prediction model :slight_smile:

Because in the long term you plan to use optical measurements, the uncertainty will be related to your optical measurements. It is difficult to know the uncertainty because it is related to the sensor. Good sensors have a small sigma value and bad sensors have a big one. I know that calibration campaign using ephemeris based orbit detemination of GNSS satellites can be used to calibrate the sigma value of optical sensors. Unfortunately, Iโ€™m not an expert of that method. The best is to ask the sensor costumer or main users about the uncertainty of the measurements it provides.

At the end I think the estimated orbit will be close between a rough guess and a perfect guess of the sigma. The main difference will be on the estimated covariance matrix.

initQ is the dark side of the Kalman Filter :slight_smile:
initQ represents the expected error of your prediction model. Therefore, it depends on the prediction model you will use. With an accurate prediction model, you shall set small values.
It is really difficult to intialize this matrix. Personally, Iโ€™m a bit scared of this matrix because it has a significant impact on the estimated solution and we donโ€™t know what to put inside.
To give you an example, there is an Orekit tutorial for which we perform accurate orbit determination of Lageos 2 satellite with an initQ of [1.e-9, 1.e-9, 1.e-9, 1.e-12, 1.e-12, 1.e-12]

Best regards,
Bryan

1 Like